|
|
Langworthy
Company |
|
|
|
|
Revised: 05/03/2002
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Since 1983, Langworthy Company has been diagnosing illnesses and
prescribing remedies for ailing area companies."
Services
"Becoming a good "People don't resist change, they resist
transition."
|
|
STEP 4: Posting Great Ads is the foundation to recruiting programs Posting Great
Ads: The Foundation of
Your Recruiting Program Internet ads are very
effective in reducing your cost per hire. Great ads are particularly well suited
for attracting candidates that may not have their resume posted on the Internet,
but are actively reading ads. Most top candidates are willing to respond to a
compelling ad. You should consider these
key elements when posting your ads to the CareerBuilder Network:
CareerBuilder Will Cross-Post Your Ad
Like any advertisement for a
product or service, your employment ad must get maximum exposure. That means it
must be placed in multiple locations. By using the CareerBuilder Network, you
can post your ad to over 30 other targeted sites to increase your exposure. This
is referred to as "cross-posting" or "meta-posting." Even if your company has
national name recognition, just posting ads on your Web site is never enough!
They should be posted on your Web site, of course, and be as compelling there as
any other Internet sites. It is important to
accurately choose the best Job Category when posting your ad, because it will
also get posted to other sites and expose your job opportunity to additional
candidates. The total number of sites where your ad may be cross-posted will
vary by the type of Job Category selected. The Short
Description CareerBuilder has a short
description for each job. This section should be as compelling as possible. This
short description is what the candidate initially sees when search results are
returned for their evaluation. It must quickly capture interest, so try to think
like a candidate. What can you say about this particular job that would be most
appealing? For example: "Our pre-IPO company with a long client list of Fortune
500, blue-chip firms needs a world class e-Business consultant to lead client
engagements and deliver true Internet solutions in e-commerce, b2b, and b2c. We
expect to IPO during this year." Tricks and
Secrets of Keywords The previous section covered
how to write outrageous ads. When preparing your ad content, remember that
candidates will be searching the Internet using keywords as well as job
categories. Therefore, be sure to use a lot of keywords within your ad just to
make sure that your ad will be selected by the search procedure on the
job-posting site. When you are coming up with your keywords, think like a
candidate. Ask yourself, "What words
would my perfect candidate use in their search for this opportunity?"
Many search processes rank
the keyword match by how often the word appears in the ad. After you write your
outrageous ad, it is permissible to have a section at the bottom of the ad
called "Keywords." Most candidates will know why you included it and will be
pleased that your ingenuity brought your compelling ad to their attention. It is
not so much about having a "prim and proper ad" as it is about getting the
attention of qualified candidates and creating interest in your job opportunity. For example, if you were
searching for a JAVA developer for a company in the financial industry, you
might have a keywords section that listed some or all of these: JAVA Java
Internet developer Web finance financial banking securities investment. Note
that all commas were left out; commas after each word can sometimes affect the
search engine handling of keywords. Testing Your
Job Postings As soon as your ad is posted
to the Web, you should run a test search. The objective, as discussed above, is
to think like a candidate. Using the keywords and other job/category criteria
that you think the candidate would use, pretend to be the candidate for a
few minutes. Conduct a search and see if your ad is found. If so, how close was
your ad to the top of the list that the search produced? A candidate may not
read more than 50 ads before choosing ads to answer from that list. If you ad
isn't close enough to the top, you may try changing the content, particularly
the keywords. Run a test search again. Keep at it until you get your ad as close
to the top as possible. Summary
STEP 5: Finding the right resumes There's a famous recipe for
cooking a tiger which begins, "First, catch your tiger." You can say the same
thing about recruiting. The first thing you have to do is get your tiger to
submit a resume--which often means going out to beat the bushes yourself. After
setting your initial trap by posting an "outrageous" ad on the CareerBuilder
Network, here are some additional bushes you might not have thought about: Trade Association connections--these
people network like crazy.
Companies you know of and work with--even competitors and suppliers!
Academic connections--again,
they love to get together to swap job leads.
Trade shows and presentations--the ideal candidate might just show up.
Social Network--Determine
what this type of candidate might do when not working (based on age, family,
sports, income, and similar issues) to discover other means to connect. Use these connections to
create a network with only one degree of separation from your ideal candidate.
For instance, if you're looking for someone with traditional consumer marketing
experience, you might use Procter and Gamble as a keyword when searching for
resumes. The people you find may not be an exact match for the job, but they are
likely to know people who are. Send an e-mail to these people with a clear
compelling description of what you are looking for, and ask them to forward it
to interested candidates. Identify all the keywords
that will help you to review resumes, meta-search resume banks, or search the
Web using AltaVista and Yahoo for a candidate. In addition to the typical
functions, also include special technical terms, geography, titles, academics,
societies, and names of potential employers. Make sure to include the words
"resume" and "education" in your search criteria. If you are not willing to
relocate, include area codes from your surrounding areas. You'll be amazed at
the resumes just sitting out there on the Internet waiting to be discovered.
Your goal is to create an active network of people who will recommend your
position to a "passive" candidate. A major problem, of course,
is that many of your prospective tigers will turn out to be dogs. Most
professional recruiters don't spend their time calling on unsolicited resumes.
However, an e-mail message to targeted resumes may help you find interested
candidates and filter out unqualified ones. In your e-mail, restate your
original compelling job ad, and then ask the candidate to respond back with a
half-page summary of a past comparable accomplishment. We use this same approach
for candidates who submit their resume in response to an ad. Often their
response to this question will give you much better insight into the candidate's
desire and ability than a resume ever will. What To Do
When You Get a Great Resume The Internet has shaken up
the recruiting business as dramatically as it's changed most other aspects of
our everyday lives. We're all working and thinking differently as we take
advantage of what's possible on the Web. And probably the most dramatic change
is in the speed of our response to a great resume. Who knows how long that
resume has been making the digital rounds? Just because it's up there on your
computer screen, apparently as fresh as dawn, that doesn't mean you can relax
and wait. It might have been making the electronic rounds for weeks, seen by
everyone--including all those other recruiters. Your work has just begun: you
have to turn a great resume into a strong candidate. And to do that, you need to
create a fast and effective process for bringing the best candidates aboard. We've developed what we call
the "1-2-3" Rule for dealing with great resumes. Within one day--that's just 24
hours--you need to express your interest and get the process started. An auto-response e-mail is
useful here, but be sure to make it sound personal and heartfelt. For example,
it could begin like this: "Thanks for sending in your
resume. You've got an impressive background. We'll be back in touch with you
very shortly." Avoid the whining approach used by too many organizations: "We
regret that we can't answer all replies personally." Not a very upbeat way to
start a relationship, is it? Then, within two days (48
hours), phone the top two or three candidates. Your goal is to schedule a
personal interview to be completed no more than three days later. Ideally, the interview
should be followed by a successful offer and hire a week or two after that. To win the e-talent wars,
you need some old-fashioned creativity and a new game plan to make the most of
the speed and reach of the Internet. It's an evolving learning process. Only
those who fail to embrace it need worry about their own futures. Using
CareerBuilder CareerBuilder offers two
excellent online tools to help you acquire and manage candidate resumes. Using the same online
interface you use to post ads to the CareerBuilder Network, you can set up the
initial management of inquiries to your postings in order to meet these
timetables. Using a simple Web interface, you will be able to review the resumes
of those who have responded to specific ads. Once you click on a specific
resume, you will have a series of tabs across the top of the page that include: 1) The candidate's resume.
2) Your job summary data so you can quickly compare the resume to the position
requirements. 3) Scoring notes that enable you to rate the resume for position
suitability and jot down any thoughts. 4) Sections to either reply via e-mail to
a candidate and/or forward a copy of the resume, with your notes, to another
recruiting team member. The CareerBuilder Network
Resume Database allows you to proactively seek candidates by industry,
education, salary, location, key words and more. By creating a Resume Search
Agent, you can sit back and let the CareerBuilder Network do the work. The
database will notify you when newly posted resumes arrive that match your
candidate criteria.
STEP 6: Manage the screening process Different
Candidate Types Require Different Tactics In developing our POWER
Hiring System, we've defined four different types of potential candidates. These
definitions matter when targeting your online efforts.
The first two types of
candidates are those you're after--the Active/Active and the Passive/Active.
They're the job seekers who can be brought into the fold quickly, at an
attractive cost per hire, and they're also the job seekers who can be reached
most effectively using the Internet. The payoff is worth what it costs to source
them online. Active-Active:
These candidates are actively--and personally--seeking a new job. They respond
to ads that are placed on Internet sites that cater to the skill set and/or
industry of your target candidate. They may also respond to ads on your company
Web site. Some of these candidates want more control over their contacts and
will not post their resume. The key is to move fast. These candidates typically
e-mail resumes to multiple ads over a relatively short period of time. If they
respond to an ad on your company Web site, they will typically decide whether to
send a resume based on the design and content of your site. If they respond to
your ad placed on an Internet job board, over 50 percent will visit your Web
site before deciding to send a resume. Would your company ever fail
to acknowledge an inquiry by a customer or potential customer? I doubt it! You
should always treat candidates as customers. First, make sure that you send an
automatic e-mail response to all interested candidates. The e-mail should
accomplish three things:
A sample automatic e-mail
might say something like this: "Thank you for sending us your resume. You have
an interesting background. We are looking for a [insert a brief, compelling
description of the job opportunity here]" Then ask, "Please resubmit you resume
with a 1/2-page description of your most significant comparable accomplishment
and we'll get back to you right away. If this opportunity is not the right fit
for you, please feel free to pass this e-mail on to a friend or associate who
you feel might be interested. Thank you!"
Passive-Active:
These candidates usually just post their resumes and wait for you to come to
them. They're active in the sense that they want a new job, but are not
personally too involved. They sometimes answer ads as well. The key is to move
fast, especially for those that have just posted their resumes. When candidates
post a resume, they will receive multiple phone calls and e-mails afterward.
Competition is very fierce for these candidates. If they are an obvious fit,
call them immediately. Don't even wait one day! For those that you are not sure
about, use the same email message approach described above. Interested
candidates will self select and those who aren't a good fit may become a good
source of referrals to other candidates who are. Once again, whether you contact
the candidate by phone or email, you must have a compelling opportunity
described in an intriguing way. Upgrade Your
Own Web Site One of the first things an
interested candidate is likely to do, even before responding to an ad or sending
a resume, is visit your Web site. Your Web site can be the key to landing these
highly competitive candidates. For all the reasons previously listed, your site
must create enough interest to get the candidate to send you their resume. Your
broadcast e-mail should direct them to a specific area of the Web site that will
accept their resume and create further interest. With so many great Web sites
around, your own has to be up to certain minimum standards just to hold a
visitor's attention. Here are some of the things it should feature:
STEP 7: Keeping Emotional Control - - Are first impressions dangerous to
your hiring health? Here's the single most
valuable thing I can tell you about the interview process: Wait 30 minutes
before making any decision about a candidate's ability to do the work. That's
because first impressions (based on emotion, bias, chemistry, personality, and
all sorts of stereotypes) cause most hiring errors. First impressions are
largely about style. Style, or the lack of it, has more impact on hiring than
substance. We hire people whose style we like--and are often disappointed. We
reject people who don't seem to have any style--and then never know what we
missed out on. The real problem is that once we accept or reject a candidate,
the evaluation process shuts down. The quicker this happens, the less new
information we seek out and process. We still go through the motions of asking
questions, but we either use the answers to support our first impressions or
ignore them if they seem to conflict. The key to effective hiring
is to move beyond this type of emotional reaction to a candidate and substitute
something more important (the job itself, for example) as the dominant selection
criterion. Emotions play a powerful role in the interviewing process.
Unfortunately, the role they tend to play is negative. We're wired to make bad
hiring decisions; we need to reprogram ourselves to keep our emotions under
control. The Important
Rules The old hiring rule based on
the Four A’s (articulate, affable, attractive, and assertive) just doesn't seem
to work anymore. Here's my second most important rule: Past Performance is
the Best Predictor of Subsequent Performance. If you measure performance
first (what we call The Top-Down Approach), then character, and leave
personality for last, you'll increase your hiring accuracy by 50%. Think of your internal
decision-making mechanism as a three-way switch, with "Yes" at one end, "No" at
the other, and "Maybe" in the middle. It's important to keep your switch at the
"Maybe" position for as long as possible. Moving to "Yes" too early might make
you feel relaxed, but it's also likely to end in tears--causing you to ignore
negative data, globalize strengths, slip into a selling mode, and, worst of all,
to stop listening. A premature "No" can be equally dangerous. Biases about age,
physical characteristics, and even race can easily override a candidate's strong
points. Try to remember that nobody is really at their best during an interview.
Even the seasoned professionals get anxious or tense. The good news is that
these effects usually wear off after 15 or 20 minutes. Hopefully, your switch
will still be in the "Maybe" position when that happens. All this makes it vital for
you to know your own interviewing style, so that you can keep it under control.
We all have a tendency to seek out aspects of ourselves in the people we choose,
which is not necessarily a bad thing, but it can sometimes lead to a kind of
tunnel vision that excludes their possibilities. By taking a hard look at your
own interviewing techniques, you open yourself up to a wider range of talents
and abilities. There are three basic styles
of interviewing: emotional, intuitive, and technical. Which one describes you?
If you make fast decisions (less than five minutes, let’s say) based on things
like first impressions and personal biases about personality and appearance,
then you're definitely in the emotional group. If it takes you up to 15 minutes
to decide, and you base your judgment on your "gut" feeling about a few critical
traits, you're an intuitive interviewer. Technical people take a longer time
(over an hour) to come to a positive decision, basing it on a candidate's strong
skills, experiences, and methodologies. Defining
Work-Related Behavior In a broad sense, all
work-related behavior can be divided into three categories: performance,
character, and personality. Performance-based abilities have to do with getting
the work done: technical competency, initiative, organizational ability,
leadership and team skills. Character is the sum of deep-rooted traits like
honesty, reliability, and integrity. Personality concerns affability, social
confidence, and physical presence. The perfect candidate scores high in all
three. But the problem is that some of these abilities are harder to measure
than others, especially in an interview situation. Of the three, personality
would seem to be the quickest one to come up with a reading on. But then we fall
back into the trap of first impressions. At a seminar, I asked the 75 attendees
to add up everyone they had ever worked with closely that they actively
disliked. Most of them came up with a total of five or six--a tiny fraction of
the total. Then I turned the tables and asked them how many of the people they
interviewed they disliked or absolutely couldn't work with. The result was
anywhere from 40% to 80%. Not only was this a truly shocking differential, but
it’s also a lesson for us all. Obviously, personality is not a reliable
hiring criterion. Character is harder to
measure than personality, but it doesn't have the same emotional tug for most
people. Like personality, however, character (though definitely important for
on-the-job success) turns out to be a poor predictor of whether a candidate can
actually do the job. Performance is a whole
different ballgame. Of the three core traits, performance is the easiest to
measure and, as I've said, the best predictor of success. Interviewing
Tips Here are 10 Quick Tips to
get you through that all-important first 30 minutes of an interview:
STEP 8: Performance based interviewing techniques In over 25 years of
recruiting experience I’ve learned two important lessons: First, past
performance is the best predictor of future performance; and second, people who
have been top performers tend to stay top performers. The goal of every
interview should be to uncover a clear picture of the candidate’s past
accomplishments. You can conduct a complete interview to accurately measure past
performance and predict future performance with only four questions. Sound too
good to be true? Stay tuned. The Right
Stuff The best predictors of
success are a track record of high energy (work ethic, initiative), team
leadership, and some level of comparable past performance. The likelihood of
success is high for candidates with this profile. Add the strong ability to
adapt and produce in a new environment and you’ve got an excellent candidate.
Using just four questions, this type of profile can be determined for any
candidate. Asking about four to eight major past accomplishments in a patterned
question format is the key to this type of interviewing approach. Past
accomplishments should focus on individuals, teams, and specific jobs. When
combined with fact-finding, these questions can reveal all the important details
of each accomplishment. The Four
Questions: What to Listen For Question 1:
"Please describe your most significant accomplishment." Ask this question for the past two or three jobs. Listen for
personal energy and impact. Use fact-finding to get many examples and
details--when, why, how, impact, results, and timeline. Ask SMART questions
(Specific, Measurable, Action-Oriented, Results-based, Time-bound). This should
take five to ten minutes. Make sure the candidate paints a detailed word picture
of each accomplishment and provides specific examples.
Question 2: "Please draw an organizational chart and describe your most
significant team or management accomplishment." Look for Span of Control and team leadership over the last
two or three jobs. Get examples of the candidate's actual role, the time and
effort involved, any interpersonal challenges that arose, how well the candidate
motivated others and dealt with conflict. During this five- or ten-minute
discussion, get details about actual team results and what the candidate would
have done differently.
Question 3: Anchoring:
"One of our key performance objectives is __________ [Insert the most important
S.M.A.R.T. objective for your job]. Tell me about your most significant
comparable accomplishment." What you're looking for here is Job Specific Competency. Make
sure you dig out plenty of details in order to minimize exaggeration. Many
candidates can come up with initial examples that sound great, but as you delve
deeper and probe you will discover the scope, initiative, and resources that
helped them to achieve their results. Make sure that the candidate can anchor
each major performance objective of the new job with a comparable past
accomplishment. This question will take at least 10 minutes to answer if you are
pushing for details. If they were working on a team, make sure the candidate
clearly identifies their role and not just team accomplishments. You’re
not hiring the team, just the individual player.
Question 4: Visualization:
"If you were to get this job, how would you go about implementing and organizing
____________ [Insert the most important performance objective]?"
The purpose of this question is to see how effectively a
candidate would apply his or her capabilities to new job needs. We call this a
visualization question. Their answer should give a good idea of a candidate's
adaptability, as well as their ability to contribute in a new environment. As
you listen to the answer, consider these specifics:
Ask this
question for the top two or three performance objectives. Sound simple? It absolutely
is … and it's guaranteed to help you find and qualify candidates. Just make sure
you use fact-finding and lots of examples to get all the necessary details
(when, why, how, impact, result, and time). Ask SMART questions. Situational
questions help target job-specific problem solving, flexibility, insight,
communication skills, strategic and tactical planning, intelligence,
self-confidence, and communication skills. Caution: you must combine this with a
strong pattern of past performance. Panel
Interviews: Learn More While Staying Cool If you want to save time,
learn more, and eliminate your emotional biases, try a Panel Interview. If done
right, it can be one of the most effective tools for assessing competency.
Shorter interviews test chemistry and fit but tend to be a little superficial. Hint: "Interviewing"
personality is not the same as "on-the-job" personality. Here is some basic advice on
conducting a panel interview:
Here's another hot tip: Give
the candidate a take-home problem to present in the panel session. This fosters
a "real life" discussion about the job and makes the interview more of a working
session.
STEP 9: Is Your Candidate a Perfect 10? Use the checklist to rate
candidates on a scale of 1 (weak) to 5 (strong). 1. Energy,
Drive, Initiative.
Don't ever compromise on this one, because it's the universal trait of success.
The key to personal success is to do more than you have to, so look for this
quality in every past job. Get examples of initiative and extra effort. Don't
assume that an extroverted personality means lots of energy; have the candidate
prove it by example, including specific dates, facts, and quantities. But the
reverse is also true: a low-key person often has more energy and enthusiasm than
an extrovert. It takes patience on your part to draw them out. 2. Trend of
Performance Over Time. By asking questions about leadership and impact on a company, you get
detailed examples of a candidate's major accomplishments and organizational
changes over the past five to ten years. From this, it's easy to see how the
candidate has grown and impacted the organization. The ideal candidate has had
comparable jobs and is still showing signs of upward growth. Rank this person a
5 on your scale. But remember: a comparable job doesn't have to be an identical
job. Look at staff size, issue complexity, performance standards, company growth
rate, sophistication level, etc.. Combine these factors and search for an upward
growth pattern. 3.
Comparability of Past Accomplishments. Use
SMART (Specific, Measurable, Action-oriented, Results-based, and Time-based)
objectives to compare a candidate's past accomplishments with the required
performance objectives of the job to be filled. Be concerned about mismatching.
A highly energetic designer might be ineffective as a manager, and very bright
consultants aren't always the best candidates for technical jobs. Make sure you
have a copy of all the SMART objectives handy during the interview, and get
anchoring accomplishments for each one. Give a candidate a 5 if comparable past
accomplishments for each one are offered, a 4 if all but one matches up, and so
on. 4. Experience,
Education and Industry Background.
Use this in tandem with the Past Accomplishments category. Strong education and
experience can sometimes offset a weaker accomplishment rating. Examine
experience in the context of the environment--the pace, style, and standards of
performance where the experience took place. If the candidate's previous company
had a slower pace and lower standards, of course, 10 years of experience doesn't
mean as much. Give some credit for direct industry experience and education. Add
a point or two if these add significantly to the candidate's ability, or if they
improve the job fit. 5. Problem
Solving and Thinking Skills. How smart does a candidate need to be to be effective on the
job? Just smart enough--any less and you're in trouble. A strong candidate needs
to understand the work, solve job-related problems, and anticipate what needs to
be done. Collecting and processing information to make appropriate decisions is
important; so is the ability to apply previous knowledge and experience to
solving new problems. Asking a SMART visualization question about the actual job
tests all of these things much better than any intelligence test ever devised.
You'll gain an understanding of the candidate's thinking and reasoning skills,
adaptability, communications skills, logic, decision-making powers, and problem
solving abilities. 6. Overall
Talent, Technical Competency, and Potential. How you rank a candidate in this broad category
depends very much on the needs of the job to be filled. The score should
represent the candidate's ability to grow, develop, and take on bigger roles. To
get a 4 or a 5 in this category, candidates should have a broader focus than the
job demands. Search for thinking skills (the same ones described in Category 5,
but here you're looking at them in conjunction with other abilities to evaluate
potential); breadth of business understanding (candidates who see the broader
needs of a business beyond their own functional requirements add strength to an
organization); application of technical skills (the ability to learn technical
skills is often more important than already having them, unless the job is very
technically intensive and requires immediate knowledge.) 7. Management
and Organization.
Most interviewers focus on individual competency instead of managerial skills.
This approach is a major cause of hiring error! If the management and
organizational aspects of the job are important, spend as much time as necessary
to validate a candidate's competency. Use projects to get at organizational
skills, even if the candidate doesn't have a big staff. Ask a candidate to
describe their most complex team project--you might be surprised at the answer.
Early in the interview, have the candidate draw an organizational chart for the
last few positions. Assign names, title, and direct and indirect staff size.
This shows the size and scope of candidate responsibility; perfect for
comparison with your current job needs. 8. Team
Leadership: The Ability to Persuade and Motivate Others.
Team leadership is a component of both management and personality: it's
important enough to consider separately. It represents the ability to tap into
and harness the energy of others -- getting them to move in the same direction,
to do something they might not want to do. Team leadership has two aspects --
motivating your immediate subordinates and motivating people who work in
different departments. Motivating a subordinate is easier: look for managers who
can point to a number of people they have personally helped to become
successful. Give high scores to candidates who consistently go out of their way
to hire superior people, and then take a sincere interest in upgrading their
skills. As for motivating people outside their own department, get examples of
major team projects and use fact-finding to uncover the candidate's true role. 9.
Character: Values, Commitment, and Goals. Character is a deep-rooted trait that summarizes a person's integrity,
honesty, responsibility, openness, fairness in dealing with others, and personal
values. Save this whole topic until the end of the first interview, or wait for
the second interview. It will be more relevant then, and candidates will be more
open and comfortable with their responses. Ask candidates to explain their
personal value system and how they developed it. Be sure to listen carefully;
this answer can be very revealing. It's important to know why someone wants to
change jobs and what aspects of work that the person finds important.
Understanding a candidate's value system allows you to predict how they will
react to various work-related circumstances. When talking about goals, be
specific: ask a candidate to describe one or two major goals already
accomplished. 10.
Personality and Cultural Fit. Personality is revealed in an individual's accomplishments.
Look for flexibility and a pattern of accomplishments in different situations:
as a team member, as leader of a team, and as an individual contributor. You can
discover a preferred relationship pattern by categorizing the candidate's
accomplishments on the ABC scale: "Alone," "Belong to team," or "in Charge of
the team." This type of analysis becomes even more valuable when the candidate
is free to pick the accomplishment. Keep track of the responses by putting
little marks on top of your notes (Consider making three columns: A, B, and C).
By the end of the interview, a definite and revealing pattern should emerge. |